Wang v NSW

[2023] NSWCA 124

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Appeal
3. › Application for leave to appeal
4. › Interlocutory decisions
5. › Whether error shown in House v The King sense
6. › Whether leave should be granted where appeal doomed to fail
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Summary dismissal
3. › No reasonable cause of action
4. › Abuse of process
5. › Whether statement of claim disclosed reasonable cause of action
6. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 14.28
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Vexatious proceedings
3. › Whether court should make vexatious proceedings order of its own motion
4. › Self-represented litigant requiring interpreter
5. › Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 8(1), 8(4)

Quick Take

This case is a routine application of established principles and has minimal precedential value beyond illustrating the application of the House v The King test to leave to appeal applications and the Court's approach to potential vexatious proceedings orders for self-represented litigants.

Case Details

Citation[2023] NSWCA 124

CourtNSWCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2023Wang v State of New South WalesNSWSC 1478
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on11

2022Choi v Secretary, Department of Communities and JusticeNSWCA 170
2022Muriniti v Lawcover Insurance Pty LtdNSWCA 159
2022Wang v State of New South Wales & OrsNSWSC 1700
2022Li Wang v State of NSWNSWSC 544
and 7 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in