Odtojan v Condon

• 1. Courts and Judges
  2. › Bias
  3. › Apprehended bias
  4. › Actual bias
  5. › Primary judge raised many queries and concerns in course of applicant's oral address
  6. › Whether interventions exceeded permissible bounds
  7. › Whether fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend judge might not bring impartial mind
• 1. Civil Procedure
  2. › Fair hearing
  3. › Procedural fairness
  4. › Whether breach of procedural fairness in making of orders
  5. › Concession that amended statement of claim needed reformulation
  6. › Indicative orders raised with parties
  7. › Whether applicant gave up entitlement to reasons
• 1. Civil Procedure
  2. › Pleadings
  3. › Fraud and conspiracy
  4. › Need for proper basis and articulation of allegations
  5. › Whether pleading complied with requirements for pleading fraud
  6. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.14
  7. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.28
• 1. Civil Procedure
  2. › Interlocutory orders
  3. › Power to make directions
  4. › Whether orders requiring service of affidavits and documents with draft amended pleading were ultra vires
  5. › Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 2.1

Quick Take