Imperceptible subsidence of 1.5mm or modestly greater does not constitute the surface being 'disturbed' under cl 2(1)(a) of Sch 6B when a landowner's substratum has been compulsorily acquired for underground rail facilities, and whether disturbance is non-trivial depends on the factual context including the current and potential use of the land.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.