Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v TM

[2023] NSWCA 75

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Statutes
2. › Construction
3. › Departure from literal meaning
4. › Inadvertence by legislature
5. › Whether incoherent results justify refusing to apply statutory text
6. › Limited qualification on operation of provision sufficient to avoid incoherence
7. › Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW), ss 3(3), 3A(2)(c)(ii), 3A(5)
1. Statutes
2. › Construction
3. › Amendment and repeal
4. › References to amended or repealed statute
5. › Whether repealed provision and replacement provision are 'corresponding provisions'
6. › Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 68(3)
7. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 91H, 578B
1. Criminal Law
2. › Child protection
3. › Offenders registration
4. › Registrable person
5. › Exception for juvenile offenders committing single offence
6. › Meaning of 'arising from the same incident'
7. › Whether possession of child abuse material is offence 'committed against' a person
8. › Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW), ss 3(3), 3A(1), 3A(2)(c)(ii), 3A(5)
9. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 91H

Quick Take

Section 3(3) of the CPOR Act applies to the s 3A(2)(c)(ii) exception for juvenile offenders charged with multiple possession offences under s 91H of the Crimes Act, and where the material depicts actual children, the offences are 'committed against' those children — meaning the exception requires the offences to be committed against the same person within 24 hours.

Case Details

Citation[2023] NSWCA 75

CourtNSWCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on6

2022State of New South Wales v KaiserNSWCA 86
2014Taylor v The Owners - Strata Plan No 11564HCA 9
2010Whiley v RNSWCCA 53
2004Woolworths Ltd v ListerNSWCA 292
and 2 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in