Zioukin v BE Commerce Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATAP 110 — Unrepresented Appellant & No Sufficient Basis Shown — Barrister AI
← Back
Zioukin v BE Commerce Pty Ltd
[2023] NSWCATAP 110
NCAT Appeal Panel
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Appeal
›
unrepresented appellant
›
application for vacation of
hearing made on day
›
no sufficient basis shown
no basis to
adjourn - appeal from decision in Consumer and Commercial Division - no relevant
Case Details
Citation
[2023] NSWCATAP 110
Court
NSWCATAP
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] NSWCATAP 110
5 authorities it relies on
1978
1987
1996
2005
2014
2023
Relies on
5
2023
Zioukin v Lang
NSWCA 42
2014
AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian
NSWCA 40
2013
Bovaird v Frost
NSWCA 91
2009
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University
HCA 27
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works