Ugur v Public Guardian [2023] NSWCATAP 16 — Administrative Law & Adequate — Barrister AI
← Back
Ugur v Public Guardian
[2023] NSWCATAP 16
NCAT Appeal Panel
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Appeal
›
Administrative law
›
Guardianship
procedural fairness was denied to the appellant
›
whether reasons were
adequate
›
whether the decision was unreasonable
whether there
Case Details
Citation
[2023] NSWCATAP 16
Court
NSWCATAP
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] NSWCATAP 16
8 authorities it relies on
1985
1993
2001
2009
2017
2023
Relies on
8
2014
SZSSC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
FCA 863
2006
Malouf v Malouf
NSWCA 83
2000
K v K
NSWSC 1052
1991
Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc
FCA 844
and 4 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works