Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Hughes v Midson [2023] NSWCATCD 168 — Home Building & Oral Variations — Barrister AI

Hughes v Midson

[2023] NSWCATCD 168

NCAT Consumer and Commercial Division

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Building and Construction
2. › Home building
3. › provisional sums
1. contract
2. › oral variations
1. Building and Construction
2. › Home
1. building
2. › defects
3. › work order or monetary remedy

Case Details

Citation[2023] NSWCATCD 168

CourtNSWCATCD

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on9

2018Downer EDI Rail Pty Ltd v John Holland Pty Ltd; John Holland Pty Ltd v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd (No 5); Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd v John Holland Pty Ltd (No 4)NSWSC 326
2016Owners Strata Plan 78465 v M D Constructions Pty LtdNSWSC 162
2014The Owners - Strata Plan No 76674 v Di Blasio Constructions Pty LtdNSWSC 1067
2011Xu v Jinhong Design & Constructions Pty LtdNSWCA 277
and 5 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works