The parity principle does not require identical sentences for co-offenders where the different custodial histories, rehabilitation prospects, effect of delay, and totality considerations arising from other unrelated sentences justify the differentiation. An applicant's sense of grievance based on an incomplete comparison of headline sentence figures, without evaluating the role of totality and the different effect of delay on each offender's circumstances, will not be justified.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.