Where tendency evidence is admitted against a co-accused only, the appellate court will assess prejudice with hindsight by examining: (1) the practical separability of the tendency evidence from the evidence against the appellant; (2) the proportion of the trial devoted to the co-accused's evidence versus the appellant's; (3) the adequacy of judicial directions; and (4) whether the jury's verdicts demonstrate discrimination inconsistent with prejudicial contamination. Discriminating verdicts including acquittals on some counts are a significant indicator that the jury was not overwhelmed by prejudicial evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members.