The case illustrates the application of the M v The Queen test for unreasonable verdicts in a circumstantial joint criminal enterprise murder case. CCTV footage, telephone records, cell tower data, and intercepted admissions were held to overwhelmingly establish the applicant's participation, leaving no reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence. Alternative hypotheses that the applicant merely gave the shooter a lift or that the agreement did not extend to murder were rejected as mere conjecture.
The full text is available to signed-in members.