R v Haile [2023] NSWSC 167 — Admissibility & Previous Reasons — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Haile
[2023] NSWSC 167
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Evidence
›
admissibility
›
leave sought to reagitate
admissibility of evidence excluded pre-trial
›
previous reasons
exclusion still relevant
›
further prejudice where forensic choices in
witness cross examination already made and acted
Case Details
Citation
[2023] NSWSC 167
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] NSWSC 167
1 authority it relies on
2023
Relies on
1
2023
R v Haile
NSWSC 42
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works