The King v Kenafake [2023] NTSC 37 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
The King v Kenafake
[2023] NTSC 37
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+5 more
Criminal Law
›
Jurisdiction, practice and procedure
›
Joinder of charges
›
Criminal Code (NT) s 309(1) - whether charges form part of a series of offences of the same or similar conduct
›
where legal character and components of the offences have significant degree of similarity
›
where the offences are sufficiently similar in fact
›
charges properly joined.
Criminal Law
›
Jurisdiction, practice and procedure
›
Application to sever indictment
›
evidence cross-admissible between counts for tendency purposes
›
potential prejudice may be addressed by a proper direction to the jury
›
application dismissed.
HML v The Queen [2008] HCA 16; (2008) 235 CLR 334; The King v LJ [2023] NTSC 17; The Queen v O’Brien [2017] NTSC 34, applied.
Marcus White (Pseudonym) v R1 [2022] VSCA 27; The Queen v TJB [1998] 4 VR 621; The Queen v CC [2021] NTSC 41, distinguished.
Case Details
Citation
[2023] NTSC 37
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] NTSC 37
21 authorities it relies on
1937
1954
1971
1988
2005
2023
Relies on
21
2023
The King v LJ
NTSC 17
2022
Rankine v The Queen
VSCA 27
2021
The Queen v CC
NTSC 41
2018
The Queen v Dennis Bauer (a pseudonym)
HCA 40
and 17 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works