The Nagy approach to sentencing for multiple offences may result in the imposition of life imprisonment as the head sentence, provided it can be shown that the most serious offence considered separately would itself warrant the maximum penalty. The fact that life imprisonment carries consequences beyond those of any finite cumulative sentence (including the possibility of never being paroled and lifetime parole supervision) does not constitute an impermissible collateral consequence where the sentencing judge specifically considered and endorsed those outcomes. The question left open by the 2-1 split is whether the Nagy approach can be used to impose life imprisonment where the individual offence would not, standing alone, warrant the maximum penalty.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.