Evidence mentioning an intervention order does not occasion a miscarriage of justice where the context of the evidence makes clear the order was not directed at the accused. The failure to redact such evidence from a jury transcript does not constitute a miscarriage of justice where defence counsel was centrally involved in the editing process and the evidence was not capable of prejudicing the accused. A transcript editing protocol is not akin to a Practice Direction and requires the active involvement of the parties via their counsel.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.