Medical consultation notes containing hearsay narratives, prior consistent statements, and the treating doctor's opinions about domestic violence cannot be tendered as exhibits or placed before the jury merely because the doctor is giving oral evidence. A direction to the jury to use such notes only as 'context' and not to bolster credibility is artificial and incapable of curing the prejudice, particularly where the notes remain with the jury as an exhibit during deliberations. A prosecutor who makes false assertions of fact to the jury (here, asserting a fracture when X-rays showed none) and uses those assertions to bolge the complainant's credibility deprives the accused of a fair trial.
The full text is available to signed-in members.