1An applicant seeking an extension of time to appeal must demonstrate prospects of success; failure to identify any specific error in the primary judge's reasoning is a cogent reason to refuse the extension.
2Grounds of appeal directed at the original administrative decision-maker's processes, rather than at the primary judge's review of those processes, do not constitute viable grounds of appeal from a judicial review decision.
3The availability of a fresh parole application, at which new material may be put before the Board, is a relevant consideration weighing against granting an extension of time to appeal a stale judicial review decision.