Sheedy v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia and Fennell Forestry Pty Ltd [2023] SAET 24 — Associated With Arthrodesis & The Respondent — Barrister AI
← Back
Sheedy v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia and Fennell Forestry Pty Ltd
[2023] SAET 24
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+14 more
payments, payment of medical expenses incurred and pre-approval of the costs
associated with arthrodesis
of the left wrist joint - the respondent
contended that Mr Sheedy has been suffering from a degenerative condition of the
Case Details
Citation
[2023] SAET 24
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2023] SAET 24
4 authorities it relies on
2006
2009
2012
2015
2018
2021
2023
Relies on
4
2016
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission v May
HCA 19
2013
CC Containers Pty Ltd v Lee (No 5)
VSC 619
2012
Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd
VSCA 232
2006
Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw
FCA 22
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
