Khalafallah v Tasmanian Civil Administrative Tribunal

[2023] TASSC 8

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Human Rights
2. › Discrimination
3. › Tribunals, Commissions and other authorities
4. › Tasmania
5. › Power of summary dismissal after investigation
6. › Misconceived or lacking in substance
7. › Response and evidence offered by respondent relevant to that determination.
1. Anti-Discrimination Act 1998 (Tas), s71, 72.
1. State of Tasmania v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal and Others [2009] TASSC 48, approved and applied.
1. Assal v Department of Health; Housing Community Services [1992] EOC 92
2. › 409; Nagasinghe v Worthington [1994] FCA 1387 [1994] 53 FCR 175; Ebber v HR & EA Commission (1995) 129 ALR 455 at 467, referred to.

Citation[2023] TASSC 8

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in