A trial judge determining family provision quantum cannot assume that an applicant could rent alternative accommodation at a lower rate without evidence of the costs of such accommodation. Where homestay income is relied upon to meet everyday expenses, a finding that a smaller dwelling would be appropriate must account for the need for sufficient bedrooms to earn that income. Foreseeable contingencies affecting an applicant's financial needs — including potential rent increases, loss of supplementary income, and increasing care costs — must be properly assessed.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.