In a joint trial for slavery offences where co-accused are tried as principals (not on a joint commission basis), the trial judge's directions are adequate if they identify the evidence solely admissible against each accused by reference to examples and provide the jury with a practical guideline (such as a 'rule of thumb') for keeping the evidence separate. The benefit derived by one co-accused from the other's use of a slave is legitimately part of the evidence of the first co-accused's own use, bearing on both the physical and fault elements of the offence. Significant problems with a complainant's credibility and reliability do not render verdicts unreasonable where there remains sufficient evidence on which the jury could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.