The court confirmed that r 54.02 of the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 and the court's inherent jurisdiction empower the court to resolve disputes about the timing and manner of disposition of a deceased's body, even where contested issues of fact exist, and that the court should avoid resolving contested factual issues beyond those strictly necessary for its determination. Where co-executors or equal beneficiaries disagree only on timing of cremation (not on cremation itself), the court will weigh the condition of the body, the public interest in dignified treatment of remains, and the prospects of any putative proceedings requiring preservation of the body.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.