The case is a straightforward application of the principle that repeated interlocutory applications on substantially the same grounds without material change in circumstances constitute an abuse of process. Participation in prior interlocutory decisions in the same proceedings does not, without more, give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.