Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

DPP v Connell (No 3) [2024] ACTSC 259 — Jurisdiction & Evidence — Barrister AI

DPP v Connell (No 3)

[2024] ACTSC 259

Supreme Court of the ACT21 August 2024

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › JURISDICTION
3. › Federal jurisdiction exercisable by Territory court
4. › whether ACT Supreme Court has power to make orders binding upon Commonwealth or Commonwealth officer
5. › consideration of s 48A of Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 (Cth)
6. › question inappropriate to resolve on interlocutory application without contradictor
1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Evidentiary matters relating to witnesses and accused persons
4. › application for nondisclosure orders in relation to identity information of witness and protection of identity of witness while giving evidence
5. › power to make orders on national security or defence grounds
6. › application allowed

Case Details

Citation[2024] ACTSC 259

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date21 August 2024

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on9

2024Bennelong Medical Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (No 5)ACTSC 194
2023Ezekiel-Hart v ACT DPPACTSC 373
2023Glavinic v CommonwealthACTSC 361
2023Zhang v The Age Company Pty LtdACTCA 10
and 5 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works