Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

DPP v Hagen [2024] ACTSC 360 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

DPP v Hagen

[2024] ACTSC 360

Supreme Court of the ACT14 November 2024

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and Punishment
4. › Sentence
5. › two separate series of serious offending over the course of a night
6. › offender with “mild” intellectual disability
7. › Bugmy & Verdins principles engaged notwithstanding countervailing factors
8. › prospects of rehabilitation somewhat guarded but continuing rehabilitative potential
9. › sentence backdated in application of totality
10. › sentenced to imprisonment
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and Punishment
4. › Sentence
5. › breach of good behaviour order with suspended sentence
6. › offender reoffended
7. › good behaviour order cancelled
8. › offender resentenced
9. › sentence made partially concurrent with fresh sentences as a matter of totality

Case Details

Citation[2024] ACTSC 360

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date14 November 2024

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2025R v Oldman (a pseudonym) (No 3)ACTSC 524

Relies on73

2024DPP v Tony Bravo (a pseudonym)ACTSC 221
2024Harlovich v SebbensACTSC 153
2023Hayne v ZhengACTSC 326
2023DPP v RueACTSC 270
and 69 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works