The Court emphasizes that the obligation under s 40(2)(a) is to disclose the best method of performing the invention as described in the specification, not the best individual component known to the inventor, where the invention is not drawn around that component.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 9 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.