› where application to appeal was non‑compliant with the Industrial Relations (Tribunals) Rules 2011 and the Appellant applied to amend her application to appeal
› circumstances where the Court may exercise discretion to allow amendment
› regard to be had to the prospects of success of the proposed grounds
Appeal and New Trial
› APPEAL GENERAL PRINCIPLES
› ERROR OF LAW
› FAILURE TO GIVE REASONS
› ADEQUACY OF REASONS
› Appellant alleged the Vice President of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission failed to give adequate reasons
› the principles about adequacy of reasons were established in DL v The Queen
› the Vice President of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission gave adequate reasons in conformity with the principles about adequacy of reasons contained in DL v The Queen
Evidence
› ADDUCING EVIDENCE
› COURSE OF EVIDENCE
› WITNESSES
› CROSS-EXAMINATION
› RULE IN BROWNE V DUNN
› whether the Vice President of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission misapplied the rule in Browne v Dunn
› no misapplication
› Vice President of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission correctly applied the principle from Curwen & Ors v Vanbreck Pty Ltd
