McKenzie v Attorney General for New South Wales

[2024] NSWCA 152

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Administrative Law
2. › Judicial review
3. › Subjective jurisdictional fact
4. › State of satisfaction
5. › Whether decision-maker formed requisite state of satisfaction
6. › Material sufficient to ground satisfaction
7. › Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 170(1)(a)
1. Administrative Law
2. › Judicial review
3. › Legal unreasonableness
4. › Revocation of parole order
5. › Whether revocation lacked evident and intelligible justification
6. › Stringent standard of unreasonableness
7. › Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 170
1. Appeal
2. › Leave to appeal
3. › Proposed appeal from dismissal of judicial review proceedings
4. › Whether decision attended with sufficient doubt
5. › Whether issue of principle or injustice reasonably clear

Quick Take

The State Parole Authority's state of satisfaction under s 170(1)(a) may be formed on the basis of material in a breach report without holding an inquiry or calling on the offender to appear, and the standard for establishing legal unreasonableness of a parole revocation decision is stringent.

Case Details

Citation[2024] NSWCA 152

CourtNSWCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on10

2023McKenzie v Attorney General for New South WalesNSWSC 1639
2018Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFWHCA 30
2013McMahon v Permanent Custodians LtdNSWCA 275
2013Sharpe v HeywoodNSWCA 192
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in