Reimers v Medical Board of Australia

• 1. Professions and Trades
  2. › Health practitioners
  3. › Registration
  4. › Specialist registration
  5. › Application for specialist registration as anaesthetist
  6. › Whether applicant fit and proper person
  7. › Whether applicant able to practise competently and safely
  8. › Whether conflation of suitability and fit and proper person constituted material error of law
  9. › Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), ss 55, 57, 60
• 1. Professions and Trades
  2. › Health practitioners
  3. › Registration
  4. › Specialist registration
  5. › Statutory construction of eligibility provisions
  6. › Relationship between ss 55(1)(f) and 55(1)(h)
  7. › Whether recency of practice may be considered under catch-all provision
  8. › Whether approved registration standard was mandatory relevant consideration
  9. › Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), ss 55(1)(f), 55(1)(h)
• 1. Administrative Law
  2. › Judicial review
  3. › Error of law
  4. › Materiality of error
  5. › Whether error in one basis of decision material where independent basis unaffected by error
• 1. Statutes
  2. › Construction
  3. › Cooperative legislative schemes
  4. › National Law adopted by reference to Queensland schedule
  5. › Whether bodies corporate constituted under each State's adoption are single national entity
  6. › Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), ss 7, 31, 36

Quick Take