NSW v JR; NSW v Dickens; NSW v Jensen

• 1. Appeal
  2. › Appeals from findings of fact
  3. › Credibility of witnesses
  4. › Whether primary judge erred in credibility and reliability findings
  5. › Whether findings contrary to uncontested evidence or compelling inferences
• 1. Appeal
  2. › Apprehension of bias
  3. › Procedural fairness
  4. › Whether trial judge's interventions gave rise to apprehension of bias or procedural unfairness
  5. › Whether excessive judicial questioning or comments
  6. › Whether real danger that trial was unfair
  7. › Whether waiver of right to object
• 1. Torts
  2. › Malicious prosecution
  3. › Criminal proceedings resulting in acquittal
  4. › Police officer instituting proceedings by charging accused
  5. › Whether police officer acted without reasonable and probable cause
  6. › Whether police officer acted with malice
  7. › Whether proceedings maintained by police officer after taken over by DPP
• 1. Torts
  2. › Misfeasance in public office
  3. › Whether malice proved
  4. › Whether unauthorised acts done maliciously by public officer in purported discharge of public duties

Quick Take