Tenenboim v R

[2024] NSWCCA 1

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Aggregate sentences
4. › Discount for guilty plea
5. › Whether discount to be applied to aggregate sentence or indicative sentences
6. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 53A(2)(b)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Commonwealth drug offences
4. › Objective seriousness
5. › Quantity of drugs trafficked
6. › Whether finding that applicant trafficked 'several times' the commercial quantity of cocaine was open on the evidence
7. › Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 302.2(1), 307.1(1), 311.2(1), 311.4(1)
1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal
3. › Sentence appeal
4. › Role of appellate court
5. › Resentencing after error identified
6. › Exercise of sentencing discretion afresh
7. › Whether original sentence appropriate notwithstanding error
8. › Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601

Quick Take

When imposing an aggregate sentence under s 53A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), the discount for a guilty plea must be applied to each indicative sentence, not to the aggregate sentence.

Case Details

Citation[2024] NSWCCA 1

CourtNSWCCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

2 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by5

2024McGregor v RNSWCCA 200
2024Harden v RNSWCCA 184
2024Flower v R; Mafiti v RNSWCCA 76
2024Db v RNSWCCA 18
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on8

2023Chan v RNSWCCA 206
2023Ae v RNSWCCA 74
2022R v DelzottoNSWCCA 117
2022Patel v RNSWCCA 93
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in