Moore v R

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Bugmy factors
  4. › Deprived background
  5. › Whether sentencing judge failed to consider mental health and Bugmy factors
  6. › Whether sentencing judge obliged to refer to every part of psychological report
  7. › Whether causal connection between mental health and offending must be established
  8. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › General and specific deterrence
  4. › Weight to be given to deterrence where offender has reduced moral culpability
  5. › Whether sentencing judge erred by giving weight to general and specific deterrence given criminal record
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Objective seriousness
  4. › Sexual intercourse without consent
  5. › Whether prior consensual sexual relationship reduces objective seriousness
  6. › Whether agreement to film sexual activity extended to acts whilst complainant unconscious
  7. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61I
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Sentencing
  3. › Manifest excess
  4. › Aggregate sentence
  5. › Whether indicative sentences for sexual intercourse without consent were excessive
  6. › Whether challenge can only be made to aggregate sentence
  7. › Comparable cases of limited utility given number of offences

Quick Take