Et v R

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal
  3. › Appeal against sentence
  4. › Aggregate sentence
  5. › Whether sentencing judge failed to assess moral culpability due to offender's youth at time of offence
  6. › Whether point not raised below may be raised on appeal
  7. › Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 76
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal
  3. › Appeal against sentence
  4. › Remorse
  5. › Whether sentencing judge erred in failing to find remorse
  6. › Where no submission made on remorse at sentencing
  7. › Whether apology constitutes remorse within s 21A(3)(i)
  8. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A(3)(i)
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal
  3. › Appeal against sentence
  4. › Manifest excess
  5. › Whether indicative sentences and aggregate sentence manifestly excessive
  6. › Historical sexual offences against children
  7. › Whether sentencing judge required to refer to specific statutory provisions
  8. › Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 21B
• 1. Evidence
  2. › New evidence on appeal
  3. › Evidence not before sentencing judge
  4. › Whether miscarriage of justice resulted from absence of new evidence
  5. › Where new evidence related to mental health
  6. › Where sentencing judge had already reduced moral culpability on account of mental health

Quick Take