Inconsistencies in a complainant's accounts that are explicable by intoxication will not render a verdict unreasonable where the central allegation has been consistent from the time of the first complaint and the immediacy and distress of that complaint provide powerful support for the complainant's evidence.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.