Harry v Inner West Council (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 1027 — Companion Animals & Administrative Law — Barrister AI
← Back
Harry v Inner West Council (No 3)
[2024] NSWSC 1027
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Animals
›
companion animals
›
dogs
›
menacing dog declaration made by authorised officer - validity
Administrative Law
›
judicial review of menacing dog declaration
›
irrelevant considerations
›
owner’s involvement in prior dog attacks
›
dog’s prior history of attacks
›
no express limitation on matters to be considered
›
subject-matter, scope and purpose of legislation
›
no implied limitation on addressing matters complained of
Civil Procedure
›
judicial review
›
commencing proceeding
›
extension of time
›
10 months extension required
›
merit of claim
›
no prejudice to public or defendant
›
evidence of psychological disability
Case Details
Citation
[2024] NSWSC 1027
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2024] NSWSC 1027
6 authorities it relies on
1947
1962
1977
1992
2007
2024
Relies on
6
2015
Australian Communications and Media Authority v Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd
HCA 7
2013
Lo v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
NSWCA 180
1992
Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission
HCA 10
1986
Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd
HCA 40
and 2 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works