› interlocutory dispute between plaintiffs and litigation funder
› plaintiffs seek to join litigation funder as a defendant
Civil Procedure
› representative proceedings
› separate determination of questions
› where appropriate
› question of whether it is appropriate in this case for a dispute between litigation funder and plaintiffs to be determined at interlocutory hearing or whether proceedings should be stayed and separate proceedings initiated
Civil Procedure
› representative proceedings
› conduct of proceedings
› meaning and application of the court’s power under Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 183
› whether the court has power to adjudicate the interlocutory dispute by relying on the power in s 183
› whether it is both appropriate and necessary to ensure that justice is done in these proceedings by determining the dispute between the plaintiffs and the litigation funder
Commercial Arbitration
› arbitration agreement
› stay of proceedings
› whether arbitration agreement is null, void, inoperative or incapable of being performed
› whether cl 14 of the Funding Agreement is an “arbitration agreement” within the meaning of that expression in s 7(1) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW)
Case Details
Citation[2024] NSWSC 1165
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.