› where severely disabled plaintiff fell during recreational horse riding activity
› where plaintiff’s low intellectual function, distractibility, impulsivity and physical disabilities increased the likelihood of falling and suffering serious harm
› social utility of riding activity to plaintiff
› whether failure to provide side walkers in close proximity was a breach of duty
Torts
› negligence
› duty of care
› whether school had non-delegable duty of care during riding activity
› riding activity found to be independent of school
› school-pupil relationship was not operative during the plaintiff’s fall
