First plaintiff embarks upon a career change and engages in training to qualify as a mortgage broker
First plaintiff claims first defendant arranged for mentoring of the first plaintiff
First plaintiff claims the first defendant made ownership and investment representations regarding a mortgage broking business (MAP Business) and induced the first plaintiff and his wife (the second plaintiff) to sell properties and transfer proceeds to the first defendant based on a promise of a 50% interest in the mortgage broking business, which were misleading and deceptive in that the first defendant had no such interest to sell
Case Details
Citation[2024] NSWSC 204
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.