Big Un Limited (in liquidation) v Evertz (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 878 — Civil Procedure & Limine From Requirements — Barrister AI
← Back
Big Un Limited (in liquidation) v Evertz (No 2)
[2024] NSWSC 878
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+13 more
Civil Procedure
›
Procedural requirements under Practice Note SC Eq 3
limine from requirements
to file and serve response or other defence, plead matters specifically, provide
particulars, serve certain
Case Details
Citation
[2024] NSWSC 878
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2024] NSWSC 878
20 authorities it relies on
1978
1987
1996
2005
2014
2024
Relies on
20
2018
Sadie Ville Pty Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) (No 3)
FCA 1107
2016
QC Resource Investments Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Mulligan
FCA 813
2012
In the Matter of Kala Capital Pty Ltd (No 2)
NSWSC 1293
2007
Macdonald v Australian Securities & Investments Commission
NSWCA 304
and 16 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
