Stanford v Pittwater Aquatic Club Co-Operative Limited (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 997 — Costs & Ordinary Rule That Applicant Pays — Barrister AI
← Back
Stanford v Pittwater Aquatic Club Co-Operative Limited (No 2)
[2024] NSWSC 997
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Costs
›
Application for imposition of an easement under s 88K
Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
›
Ordinary rule that applicant pays
defendant’s costs of proceedings
›
Whether departure from ordinary
rule
Case Details
Citation
[2024] NSWSC 997
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2024] NSWSC 997
7 authorities it relies on
2006
2010
2014
2018
2024
Relies on
7
2024
Stanford v Pittwater Aquatic Club Co-Operative Limited
NSWSC 849
2023
Jeffery v Adams
NSWSC 1270
2019
Gordon v Lever (No 2)
NSWCA 275
2018
McGrath v Mestousis (No 2)
NSWSC 32
and 3 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
