Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

The King v MK [2024] NTSC 56 — Admissibility And Relevance — Barrister AI

The King v MK

[2024] NTSC 56

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
2. › Admissibility and relevance
3. › Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act ss 97, 97A, 101
4. › whether evidence of charged acts cross-admissible and evidence of an uncharged act admissible as tendency evidence
5. › where charged and uncharged acts are child sexual offences
6. › evidence of all charged and uncharged acts has significant probative value in relation to all charges
7. › probative value outweighs any danger of unfair prejudice to the accused
8. › evidence admitted as tendency evidence
1. Criminal Law Consolidation Act and Ordinance (NT) ss 67, 72
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) ss 55, 97, 97A, 101
1. [name withheld], Uniform Evidence Law (LawBook, 16th ed, 2021)

Case Details

Citation[2024] NTSC 56

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2025DPP v Wilson (a pseudonym) (No 2)ACTCA 13

Relies on16

2024Director of Public Prosecutions v Benjamin Roder (a pseudonym)HCA 15
2022The Queen v RCANTSC 6
2021The Queen v SFNTSC 91
2020Taylor v RNSWCCA 355
and 12 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works