The deferential [name withheld] v The King standard of appellate review applies to a primary judge's determination of the quantum of reasonable remuneration for a court-appointed receiver, because fixing remuneration by the application of the legal norm of reasonableness is an evaluative judgment tolerating a range of outcomes; the correctness standard in [name withheld] v [name withheld] should not be followed.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.