Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Copeland v Smith [2024] TASSC 48 — Magistrates & Aust Dig Magistrates [1349] — Barrister AI

Copeland v Smith

[2024] TASSC 48

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Magistrates
2. › Appeals from and control over magistrates
3. › Tasmania
4. › Motion to review
5. › Generally
6. › Review of sentence - Applications that offender be ordered to serve suspended sentences of imprisonment
7. › Whether "unjust" to activate suspended sentences
8. › Whether specific error in magistrate’s consideration of ss 27 and 27B Sentencing Act 1997.
1. Aust Dig Magistrates [1349]

Case Details

Citation[2024] TASSC 48

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by1

2026Cayzer v Phoslock Environmental Technologies Ltd (Opt Out and Registration Notice)FCA 438

Relies on6

2011Tanner v BrownTASSC 59
2000Dinsdale v RHCA 54
1996R v HolcroftQCA 478
1996R v BowenQCA 479
and 2 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works