Where a complainant gives qualitatively different evidence in respect of different sexual offences alleged in the same episode — including differences in spontaneity, level of consciousness, and consistency with complaint evidence — those differences can provide a clear logical and reasonable basis for differing verdicts, even where the offences occurred in close temporal proximity.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.