A trial judge's finding that a plaintiff would 'more probably than not' have retired at a certain date does not necessarily breach Malec principles, provided the judge also adverts to the possibility of continued employment and accounts for it through vicissitudes or other adjustments.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.