This case illustrates the Court of Appeal's approach to persistent re-agitation of finally determined issues through the Registrar's power to refuse to seal documents, confirming that substantially identical documents will be rejected as an abuse of process.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.