A failure to remunerate a nominee director in a quasi-partnership company does not constitute oppression of the corporate shareholder unless there is a clear foundational understanding assimilating the interests of the corporate member and its nominee director; the separate legal personality of the corporate member cannot be disregarded at the controlling mind's convenience.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.