This case provides a detailed application of the s 31A propensity evidence framework to cross-admissibility between charges involving different child complainants, confirming that evidence of a tendency to have a sexual interest in young children and to act on it in brazen public circumstances can have significant probative value in proving mental elements (intention and sexual motivation) even where the physical acts differ between counts.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.