A lengthy interval between prior offending and charged offending does not necessarily preclude admission of propensity evidence under s 31A where the tendency is entrenched and enduring, identified with reasonable specificity, and there are marked similarities between the prior and charged offending — particularly where regard is had to the evidence of the charged act itself following [name withheld].
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.