The case illustrates the application of unreasonable verdict principles where the complainant's evidence contains inconsistencies explicable by intoxication and distress, confirming that such inconsistencies do not necessarily render a verdict unreasonable.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.