A respondent's genuine inability to provide further detail in itemised bills (e.g., due to lack of contemporaneous records) may negate the element of 'disobedience' required for contempt, even if the bills provided are arguably inadequate, and therefore may prevent enforcement of court orders requiring production of itemised bills.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.